Business Roundtable logo
Loading

Extending the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada’s Athabasca Oil Sands to the U.S. Gulf Coast will create new American jobs and increase America's energy security. The project was proposed by TransCanada in 2005 and has since overcome several regulatory hurdles – but one final obstacle remains. 

Keystone XL

Extending the Keystone XL pipeline from Canada’s Athabasca Oil Sands to the U.S. Gulf Coast will create new American jobs and increase America's energy security. The project was proposed by TransCanada in 2005 and has since overcome several regulatory hurdles. However, on January 18 the State Department, which has the authority to approve the permit for U.S. construction to begin, walked away from the Keystone XL pipeline project, a move that amounts to the deferral of thousands of jobs and improved U.S. energy security.

After an exhaustive three-year review, numerous public meetings and multiple comment periods, the Department of State’s final Federal Environmental Impact Statement found that there are no substantial environmental concerns that should prohibit approval of the permit to allow this project to move forward. The decision to approve this project, which would have had a significant positive impact on jobs, economic growth and energy security, should have been an easy one for the Administration to make. We remain confident it will get approved in the future and will continue to advocate for its construction as these types of projects remain necessary if our nation is going to grow, prosper and compete.

  • The U.S. State Department estimates that, over a two-year period, the Keystone XL project would directly employ 5,000 – 6,000 workers.
  • According to the Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI), Keystone XL would add $150 billion to U.S. GDP between now and 2035.
  • North American oil from Keystone XL could potentially replace more than one-third of the oil currently imported from the Middle East.

For more information, view our one-pager on the Keystone XL project.

Latest from the news center

  • Keystone pipeline: Delays, denials and uncertainty

    Posted: January 20, 2012 in Blogs

    Reuters columnist John Kemp hits the mark in his observing that President Obama's rejection of the Keystone pipeline reflects larger problems with the U.S. regulatory process, creating economic uncertainty that hurts our country.

  • Ozone regulations, first and foremost an economic debate

    Posted: November 17, 2011 in Blogs

    The New York Times today essays a lengthy examination of President Obama's decision to stop the EPA from issuing a new air quality standard for ground-level ozone. The story is largely about politics of the decision, as the headline so clearly communicates, "Re-election Strategy Is Tied to a Shift on Smog."

  • Delaying Keystone XL pipeline delays jobs, improved energy security

    Posted: November 11, 2011 in Blogs

    A week ago President Obama made a point of saying he would be the ultimate decision maker on whether to approve the Keystone XL pipeline. On Thursday, the State Department pushed off action on the $7 billion project until 2013, at the earliest. A roundup of reaction follows...

Sign up for our Email Newsletter

Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. Back to top